Name Calling (part 2): The case of President Obama

Lyndon LaRouche describes himself for the moment as a kind of "protector", and supporter, of US president Barack Obama. But this support is a fake. LaRouche supports no one else but himself.

Les than a year ago Obama was described by LaRouche as an agent, a monkey, a leader of a kind of "Hitler Youth".  He was described in the typical way LaRouche usually describes an opponent, by calling him all kinds of bad names, and associating him to just about everything evil. 

Read some of these quotes and ask yourself if you REALLY think LaRouche supports Obama, as he claims today?

/T

*******

"Now, I saw that in Germany: in Hitler Germany. It's exactly that. There's no distinction between the mechanism of the Obama movement and the Hitler movement--none! Because the essential thing is not the particular prejudices you have. What functions is the way you think. In a human being, it's the way you think that's important, it's not necessarily what you think. Because it's the way you think that will lead you, ultimately to what you will think. And the Obama movement is a fascist movement--by any historical standard. And you get an intimidation of people, who respond to what? They respond to a sense that there's nobody in society, in political power, who's doing a goddamned thing, about saving this nation, and its people. So people say, "You've got to go along, to get along. Don't try to change the rules, adapt to them." Go with the majority popular opinion, even if it's stupid.  I mean: Obama is a racist. I mean, with an African father--he wasn't much of an African father, but was an African father of Kenya. He was part of a British operation, which took over Kenya, through MI5's operation. But this guy was away from Kenya, and he married a Margaret Mead type, a woman who had a number of successive husbands, like Margaret Mead did. Went out to the poor, brown people, in Asia, and had sex with them! It was called "Coming in Samoa." [groans, laughter] And she wore through a number of successive husbands, and by them, had various children. And therefore, you'll find Obama's ancestry, if you chase his family tree, everybody's climbing and swinging from the branches there--from all over the world! All parts of the world! This guy is the universal man. Every monkey in every tree, from every part of the world, has participated in the sexual act of producing him. And he works for organized crime--which is a branch of British intelligence.

So why are people sucked into this thing? And what's wrong with the way we react to this phenomenon, as it affects the population in general? It's not just Obama. Obama is a disease, but he's not the infectious agent that caused the disease. He's a product of the disease, not a cause of it..."

/Internal memo for Morning Briefing, April 12 2008.

*******

"You can't have a dreamworld presumption that in some miraculous way, you're going to get Barack Obama to be reasonable. He's not been trained to be reasonable; his owners won't let him be reasonable. And he's never done anything reasonable so far, in his entire campaign, which means anything for the interests of the people of the United States. He's a babbler. He's a puppet.

So, what's the purpose, on the one hand, knowing that you will never get anything good out of Obama? Don't marry a lizard. You may like the lizard, but you're not going to have children."

/Webcast, July 22, 2008.

*******

"Yet, even under the best choice of setting, for them to attempt to illuminate Senator Obama would have been an experience like lecturing a wooden dummy. Obama just doesn't get it, and probably never will. There were already too many dummies in the field of making of economic policy, even before Obama turned up. Consider, for example, many among the members of the Congress and also today's so-called financial specialists.

I do not wish to immerse us in further speculation on the subject of Senator Obama's mental health here. I merely emphasize that as being the key to understanding the most essential features of the utter emotional and intellectual incompetence of "Buppie-and-Boomer" choice, Senator Obama, to serve as a Presidential candidate of the Democratic Party, let alone actually become the public menace he would be as President of these United States."

/August 8, 2008.

"Under no circumstances could I support the candidacy of Barack Obama for nomination or election to be the President of the United States. The issue is not only the massively undemocratic display of sheer thuggery and of vast financial support for a kind of corruption which threatens the constitutional sovereignty of the U.S.A. The effect of his nomination would also be a threat to the continued existence of our constitutional republic, and also to the hope of defense of civilization world-wide.

Our republic has made bad choices of President in the past, but none of these was as grave a threat to civilization as the prospect of Obama's election would mean under the circumstances of an onrushing general economic-breakdown crisis of the planet as a whole. Given the present circumstances in the world at large, Obama's nomination would be a tragedy for the Democratic Party and our republic; worse, his election would be a virtual act of national suicide."

/ August 7, 2008

*******

*------------------------------------*

*******

PS

The above mentioned quotes about Obama are typical for LaRouche. He does this all the time. His opponents, and the persons that he has choosen to be the enemies that the organization will make campaigns against, are ridiculed, slandered and dehumanized. This is a typical method of a CULT or a TOTALITARIAN group. And that is a fact! All totalitarian, and FASCIST, groups has used similar methods of namecalling, from the naziregime of Hitler and Goebbels. to Mussolini, to Franco, to Kim Il Sung, to Stalin and Mao.

Lets take a quick look at the LaRouche website to see whom else he has called monkey or ape! (Use the search function in the browser, and search for monkey, or ape.)

Thomas Huxley: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2006/...ped_flies.html

The Romanticist: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2003/...iscussion.html

George Bush: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2003/...iscussion.html
( "How does society go from a species of George Bush-like monkeys with about three million potential on this planet—I mean that wouldn't even get him elected, would it? [laughter]—to a level of over six billion today?" )

The person with sense perceptions methods: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2003/...hwal_kynt.html

Prince Philip: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/1998/lar_nbw_031898.html
( "man's ability that no animal has, that no monkey has--even Prince Philip, who professes to be a monkey, who claims to be a monkey"- )

Schwarzenegger: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2003/...rday_conf.html
("For example, you've got a case for disorder: Suppose, by some chance, that they elect a monkey, Arnie Schwarzenegger, the governor of California. ")

Liberals, Locke, Hobbes, Smith: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2001/...ne_prince.html 
and http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/1998/..._sci_2550.html

Darwin: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2004/...koschnick.html

George Bush again (page 14, he is "qualified as a monkey"): http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/publi...eatlhldiag.pdf

Oligarchs and Prince Philip: http://www.cecaust.com.au/pubs/pdfs/nce_v06_01.pdf

Dick Cheney is compared to a monkey and gorilla: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2004/...ct_6_full.html ( "thus, for example, if the human species were a monkey—or a Dick Cheney (comparable: one gorilla knows the other)")

F. Rohatyn, George Bush and Fr. Engels: http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/publi...624_weblhl.pdf

Those who listen to rock music: http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/publi...latestlyn.html

Cheney again: http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/publi...lltxtv4n51.pdf

Prince Philip and Darwin (ape): http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/1996/quackademics.html

Prince phillip again (ape): http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/1997/...on_africa.html

AL GORE: (Monkey) http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2004/...r_30_full.html

Look also at this example where Gore is called so many bad names that it is quite disgusting: a disease, a monkey, a babylonian oligarch, a sick man, a racist, bipolar, etc... However, he is not called a monkey... in this particular speech! http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2007/...e_babylon.html