Is the LaRouchemovement a cult?

Yes it is a cult. But there are regional differences in the movement that partially has to do with culture and partially with who the regional leader is. In some parts of the movement people has traditionally worked less hard and the members had has many friends outside the organization and even a work outside the organization (like Sweden), in other parts of the organization people work six and a half or seven days a week and are basicly isolated from the outside world.

This is a checklist from an organization that works to fight cults. If you are a member, or is interested of the organization, you should look closely at this list, and remember that the dictates from the leaders and the internal limitations that one imposes on oneself, and the pressure to do certain things from the other members of the group, are equally important to reflect upon.

http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm

Compare these patterns to the situation you were in (or in which you, a family member, or friend is currently involved). This list may help you determine if there is cause for concern. Bear in mind that this list is not meant to be a “cult scale” or a definitive checklist to determine if a specific group is a cult. This is not so much a diagnostic instrument as it is an analytical tool.

 The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.

 Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.

 Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).

 The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth).

 The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).

 The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.

 The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).

 The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).

 The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt iin order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.

 Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.

 The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.

 The group is preoccupied with making money.

 Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.

 Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.

 The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.

Now ask yourself this. Are the members of LaRouches organization discouraged or encouraged to watch TV? What happens if a member watches Ophra Winfrey, Glamour or Simpsons often? Can a member play any kind of music without being questioned? Can a member just create a facebook account or a MySpace account without any negative remarks? 

Are members free to speak up when thay think the leader, LaRouche, is wrong? Do people often do that? Do you, and other members feel comfortable when someone is critical to LaRouche? Have you ever heard LaRouche say that he was wrong, in anything? Do the organization in the USA still work politically with deployments and fundrasing six and a half or seven days a week? Are the leaders of the organization elected in a democratic way? When did the Baltimore Local (just to mention one) elect the Freeman couple as their choosen regional leaders the last time? 

To continue... Has the political shifts in the organization, been dictated democratically or by LaRouche? Who Decided that the movement at first should be against Obama (when Lyndon called him and his mother monkeys), who decided that the organization should talk well about Obama last fall? What happens if the members of the fundrasing team does not hit the quota? Are they induced to feel guilt and are they perhaps yelled at? Is it declader that they dont understand the historical importance of LaRouche/LYM or whatever? What do you think would happen if you demand to get ALL the internal documents about, lets say, why the European Leadership left the organization two years ago, and if you want to arrange a discussion or debate between one of them and LaRouche. What answer did Dino get when he wanted to have a debate in public about how the organization had been run some years ago? 

You have all heard that the fundraising was "kind of crazy" in the 80s, and that the organization borrowed too much money, but with the explaination that it could not be repaid because the government worked to shut dow the organization. Ask what that "kind of crazy" is! What would happen if you did?

Look at these two questions again. You all know that no one ever says that LaRouche is wrong. Right! If you do you will be bullied, and accused for being a traitor!

 The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.

 Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.

Now look at this one:

 Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.

Well look at this: 

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-lycurgus.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/seven-days-week.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/more-on-combat-fatigue-and-military.html

In Short. Yes, the movement of Lyndon LaRouche is a cult!

/T

PS

For another good list of the  characteristics of a cult, look at Alan Hassans "Bite-model": http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/articles/BITE.htm

FAQ, Frequently Asked Questions about Lyndon LaRouche and the LYM.

1) Is LaRouche a fascist or his he democratic? 

Would a nation led by his movement, like LYM, EAP, CEC, BUESO, etc, really be run in a democratic manner, or not?

No, he is not democratic at all! Anyone that knows the organization from the inside can testify on that! As he runs the organization he would run the world. The best thing is to quote Lyndon LaRouche himself, from a speech defending the Sudanese dictator Bashir in 2001: "In these days, it is fashionable to exaggerate the importance of democracy. Because the idea of democracy, as it is taught by international institutions, which use it as a way of manipulating governments, and manipulating people, is the idea of democracy that comes from where? In European civilization this usage comes directly from the Roman Empire."

He is not democratic at all. Neither is he a DEMOCRAT. The Democratic party in the USA has often denounced him as a fraud, a fascist and not a true Democrat!

Read more here: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/faq-is-larouche-and-lym-democratic-or.html

*********

2) Why is LaRouche saying that the world will collapse tomorrow?

His movement says that if LaRouches policies is not accepted by the leaders of the world, the global economy will collapse within the next years, and there will be a World War 3. What do you say about that?

Cults often use this kind of method. He uses this rethoric, as the cult guru he is, because he wants the members to work hard for him. If the members believe that the world will come to an end tomorrow, if he does not save the world, they will work harder for him! 

There are many similarities between the movement and religious cults that say that the "final days" are near! And as a kind of Messiah, LaRouche always claims to be right in just about everything!

Read more here: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/larouchian-armageddon-cult.html

*********

3) But what is LaRouche?

Some say that LaRouche, and his movement (like LYM and the EAP and BUESO) are leftists, others say they are rightwing. Some say they are nazi, but the nazis call the movement a "jewish conspiracy". Some say LaRouche is close to the KKK but there are lots of coloured people in his organization. What is LaRouche really?

The movement is a kind of new phenomena. It started out as a communist-movement in the 60s and still works in a way that is similar to how many leftistmovements worked in the 60s and 70s. In those days much of the political left were reallyworking like fanatics! In the 70s LaRouche established himself as the only "owner" and "leader" of the organization and moved to the right. LaRouche started to cooperate with conservative forces, antisemites, nazis and racists and therefore became more and more fascist. During these days the movement also became a kind of pseudoreligious cult.

Its often very vile methods, and its strange friends, has made many asume that it is a kind of  nazimovement, for example the Campaign Justice for jeremiah, but I cant agree. It welcomes people from all so called races and cultures, and therefore I dont agree that it is nazi or racist.

It is a political, totalitarian cult, not a nazimovement or KKK, even if LaRouche has cooperated with people from the KKK and that are nazis. It is not antisemitic in the classical sense, he is not against the jews as a race, he "only" slanders the jews that he thinks are "evil", so the movement has many jewish members and friends, including among its leadership. LaRouche is not a racist either. The movement is filled with people of all so called "races" and cultures. He has a certain vile method of slandering just about any culture, that has more to do with EXTREME manicheism than racism...

But that is no excuse. LaRouche is not a racist or an antisemite, as I see it, but WORSE! THE MOVEMENT OF LYNDON LAROUCHE IS NOT RACIST, IN THE SENSE THAT IT CARES ABOUT THE RACE, CULTURE OR BLOOD OF A PERSON. IT IS A "RACISM OF IDEAS". LAROUCHE JUDGES PEOPLES IDEAS LIKE RACISTS JUDGE PEOPLES COLOUR OF SKIN, OR CULTURE. PEOPLE ARE IN FACT DECLARED TO BE  "SUBHUMAN", BECAUSE OF THEIR IDEAS, NOT THEIR SKIN!

Read more here: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/what-larouche-is-and-is-not.html

Read also this post from the factnet on whether LaRouche is a classical antisemite or not: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/lyndon-larouche-antisemitic-or-not.html

*********

4) DUALISM

What do you mean by EXTREME manicheism? And in what sense is LaRouche manichean?

Lyndon LaRouche divides everything into good and evil, like all cults do. The good is VERY good and synonymous to TRUTH and the evil is VERY evil and synonymous to FALSE. That, my friends, is nothing else than pure manicheism. The somewhat funny thing is that LaRouche himself sometimes says and writes that dualism and "gnostic" manicheism is purely evil, but that is just a typical larouchian doublestandard... Say one thing, do another!

LaRouche has divided every culture into good and evil. Every historical event is either good or evil. Every scientist is good or evil. LaRouche would say that it follows a certain TRADITION. Platonic is good, aristotelian is evil. Republican is good, oligarchical is evil, the seintist Isaac Newton was evil while Johannes Kepler and G.W. Leibniz were good, Wagnerian music and jazz is evil while Beethoven and Bel canto is good, etc, etc...

By looking at historical figures, and political events of yesterday and today and linking them together by connection (they have similar ideas) all history, and politics today, is declared to be de facto good or evil! Thus liberalism, and free market economy, is always evil.

There are nothing in between good and evil, either the persons described are good or evil. This almost all the time leads to absurd results, as in the case of how historical figures are described. Look at Franklin delanore Roosevelt, one of the heroes of the movement. Everything that he did that does not fit in with the picture of him as "good" according to the LaRouchian thinking, is not discussed. In the case of FDR it means that it is declared that he was against economical liberalism, but the fact that he was for free trade is never mentioner. It is declared that he was against the colonial metods of Churchill, but his support for the Morgenthauplan and his support for the division of Europe into a Soviet and a British/American zone is never mentioned!

This dualism, and his conspiratorical worldview, in combination with the methods of the organization makes me think that the methods of the organization potentially is a greater threat that any "normal" racism or antisemitism!

As i said earlier...THE MOVEMENT OF LYNDON LAROUCHE IS NOT RACIST, IN THE SENSE THAT IT CARES ABOUT THE RACE, CULTURE OR BLOOD OF A PERSON. IT IS A "RACISM OF IDEAS". LAROUCHE JUDGES PEOPLES IDEAS LIKE RACISTS JUDGE PEOPLES COLOUR OF SKIN, OR CULTURE. PEOPLE ARE IN FACT DECLAREDTO BE  "SUBHUMAN", BECAUSE OF THEIR IDEAS, NOT THEIR SKIN!

Read more here: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/dualism-brief-note-on-larouchian.html

*********

5) Why do you claim that the LaRouchemovement is a cult? 

And would not any movement that works hard for the best of mankind, like the Civil Rights movement of Martin Luther king, be considered a cult, according to your definitions?

I say it is a cult, because it is a cult!

There are MANY HUGE differences in METHOD between the movement of King and the movement of LaRouche. First of all Martin Luther King allowed people to have different opinion than him, and to say so in public. He made it clear that it was important for those he worked with to rest, and take days off. He could admit that he was wrong and did not say that he knew all about everything and never in his life had been wrong. And above all, he encouraged the activists of the Civil Rights movement to get a family and have kids! (Etc, etc...)

King certainly never forced anyone to work 24/7 for nothing, like LaRouche does, who with in a laborintensive, Schachtian, manner lets the members work six and a half to seven days a week in the USA for nothing!

For me, the most important evidence that the movement is a cult, is that no one almost never disagrees with Lyndon LaRouche IN ANYTHING (and if so, it is in small, unimportant things). And that I as a member adjusted myself to what the politically accepted view was, and did not speak up when I saw something that implied that the matter could be seen from a different angle! Please read what I wrote on double standards, if you want to know more!

I am not the only one that says that the movement is a cult. Look here:

http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.Cult

http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/l/larouche-movement/brainwashing-and-lyndon-larouche/

http://yourfreepress.blogspot.com/2007/07/lyndon-larouches-campus-cult.html

http://www.justiceforjeremiah.com/NEW/larouche.htm

http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?id=2985&option=com_content&task=view

http://www.agpf.de/LaRouche.htm

http://franken-buecher.de/nazis-ohne-hakenkreuz-lyndonlarouchekult-sein-kampf-gegen-amerikanische-arbeiterschaft-buchcover-2378.html

http://lyndonlarouche.org/

and finally... :o)

http://www.songpoemmusic.com/cults/guru.htm

Read more here if you want to know how, I, the owner of this blog, thinks about the cult Lyndon LaRouche has created. Is it a cult or not:

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/is-larouchemovement-cult.html

*********

6) Are you paid by Dennis King?

The organization says that all people that speak bad about LaRouche are paid agents of people like George Soros, and Dennis King and organizations like AFF and ADL. This is what the Swedish movement say about it: Vem är rädd för Lyndon LaRouche? The Germans write this: Wer hat angst vor Lyndon LaRouche? In the USA a similar message is heard: look at these articles from the LaRouchepac site if you want to know more of what they say!

The organization has done like this ever since the start. Anyone that is a member, OR HAS BEEN A MEMBER, can easily see how this is done. EVERY PERSON that drops out of the organization and critizises LaRouche in public is declared to be an agent, even those that only speaks about what he disagrees with internally, not outside the organization. Just look at how LaRouche declared his old friend fernendos Q to be a traitor and a nazi. for heavens sake, it was laRouche that declared him to be the leaders whose dictates should be obeyed while LaRouche was in prison! Look at how he slanders the ex. european leadership to be Brittish agents. When I wrote my letter of resigination LaRouche said that he assumed that someone paid me too!

No I am not payed by anyone. I am a free mind! To oppose this Messiah-like leader, Lyndon LaRouche, is so unthinkable in the cult he has created, so I guess many members assumes that I am a paid agent of some kind too, because I write what I wite. So be it! I dont blame individual members, we were all very naive, they are too very naive!

But please visit the Webbsite of Dennis King :o) . There are a lot of important articles there: http://lyndonlarouchewatch.org/

*********

7) And Justice for Jeremiah then? 

Do you support an investgation to find out if the nazi LaRouche murdered the jew JeremiahDuggan?

No. I dont support any call to investigate the presumed nazi LaRouche, because he is no nazi and not just another nazi-thug and the oranization is FILLED with people of all so called races! It would be a huge mistake to investigate him based on that assumption. 

But I support any call to investigate the LaRouchemovement as a totalitarian cult, and to investigate why Jeremiah Duggan committed suicide, and to find out in what degree the methods of the cult contributed to it. 

I was at the conference myself in 2003 and met Duggan a few days before he committed suicide. based on what I saw back then, and based on articles like this one in the media, my conclusion is that for various reasons Duggan reacted to the methods of the organization by collapsing mentally, and it continued to recruit him, even if they clearly could see that he was unstable. To what degree the practices of the movement participated to the collapse should be investigated too. He committed suicide or broke down mentally! The blame for that should be put on LaRouche. He ordered all older members (boomers) not to interfere with the organizing the youth did and the "method" of LaRouche made him break down!!

It should also be investigated if the movement is undemocratic and fascist, and I would support any such call!

But I recommend all to visit the Justice For Jeremiah website. In opposition to LaRouche, I believe in free speech and a TRUE dialogue! http://www.justiceforjeremiah.com/

Please red this to, about why I prefer not to call LaRouche antisemitic: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/04/lyndon-larouche-and-antisemitism-why-i.html

*********

8) I have a friend that is a member of the LaRouche-cult, what should I do?

I want to quote the laroucheplanet.info page on this one, they too have a wonderful FAQ on LaRouche: "Your friend has become a Cult victim, without knowing it yet. We will soon give on this site more information on how to deal with this problem. With a Cult victim, you are up against three major walls: 1/ a "higher", "purer", and "nobler" Cause, his new goal in life, 2/ a new adoptive family (aka the "Organization", the LYM) and 3/ a surrogate father: Lyndon LaRouche. You do not know his real motivations for joining LaRouche, it could be any of these three reasons or a combination of them. But in the meantime, here are some basic advices: 1/ keep in touch with him, 2/ do not appear directly hostile toLaRouche (in order to secure point #1), 3/ criticize LaRouche constructively and with undismissable proofs (bear in mind the Larouchies spend all their time defending LaRouche against skeptical, sometimes hostile audiences- so they are well trained), 4/ keep afresh good memories from his pre-LaRouche life (holidays, girlfriend, hobbies, music, sports etc) 5/ talk about his future 6/ do not give him money, 7/ be patient, sooner or later he will come back."

*********

9) But isnt it right to call President Obama and his mother a monkey, George Bush an idiot and an ape, and Kissinger a pig? Are they not? I dont like them!

Namecalling is dehumanizing! If you ever want to find evidence for the fascist nature of the LaRouchian method: look at his use of namecalling. The use of dehumanizing names for the opponents, makes it easier for the members to distance themselves from these so called enemies. ALMOST ALL totalitarian governments and movements in history have used this kind of method.

It does not care if you disagree with them. Always treat your opponent as you would wish him or her to treat you! Do not use namecalling!

Read here for more information on this:

http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Cult.Name-calling

http://http//american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/namecalling-dehumanizing.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/name-calling-part-2-case-of-president.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/homosexuality-and-larouchian-thinking.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/name-calling-part-3-did-larouche-really.html

http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/lyndon-larouche-and-peace-through-hate.html

*********

10) But would a world with laRouche in power really be a fascist dictatorship?

My answer is yes, yes and yes! The final evidence for this can be seen in the LaRouchian call to ban Faceboook, MySpace and so called satanic computer games: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/do-you-want-larouche-to-censor-internet.html  Combine that call for a ban against the supposedly "deadly viruse" Facebook is, with the proposal for a New vanadian Constitution from 1981/2005 and there can be hardly NO doubt about it more: http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/canadian-constitution-blueprint-for.html

Yes, if ever LaRouche had won one of his bids for presidency, the world would be a mess, and the USA no longer a democratic country!

/T

FAQ. Is LaRouche, and LYM, democratic or fascist?

1)  I heard that Lyndon LaRouche called Obama a monkey and he recently called George Soros a murderer, and his affiliated political parties are known for slandering their opponents, like how EAP in Germany and Sweden ran campaigns against Olof Palme and Willy Brandt and called them nazis and satan, etc... It does not sound democratic at all! Is LaRouche really for democracy, or not, I mean,  he calls himself a Democrat and his youthmovement claims to be for human rights and democracy!?

Answer: Lyndon LaRouche is NOT democratic, even if he has been running for president in the USA in the Democratic party. 

What I, as an ex. member of his organization, would call a totalitarian figure, a fascist, but also a guru-like figure that runs a cult. That is why the  members would not say that they belong to a fascist group. 

The members can spread vile lies and slanders and bully its political opponents, while believing that they are democratic. The members can quote LaRouche and say that democracy is something dangerous, while still believing that they are democratic. The members can say that something they dislike, The Beatles, computer games, Facebook, liberals, hedonists, Obama, Kissinger should be treated as a "dangerous disease" and should be stopped and banned, while the members still thing they are acting in a democratic way! 

That is how cults work!

I wrote this on my blog earlier: "The movement... has the public aim to promote certain kinds of thinking, behavior and cultures, while SURPRESSING other kinds of thinking, behavior and cultures. Liberalism, democracy and so called hedonism, as well as so called "newtonian" science, would be BANNED if he ever got to power! The bullying namecalling methods against political opponents and OPPOSITION within his movement, and outside his movement, gives a hint how he would run a nation, if he ever got power":  .http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/what-larouche-is-and-is-not.html !"

The top-down, AUTHORITHARIAN way he runs the movement he has created, the way he treats the members within the organization, shows how he would treat the citizens of the nation, if he ever became leader of one. This is not only authoritharian or totalitarian or cultlike, this is FASCIST in the strictest sense the word is used

And Lyndon would agree. Lyndon has had many strange friends over the years. Willis Carto from the holocaust denyers at the late Liberty Lobby. President Mugabe in Zimbabwe. Nigerian and Latinamerican dictators. Colonel Seneildin in Argentina, etc. Today he is defending the Sudanese leader Bashir, that the ICC wants to put on trial for crimes against humanity.

Look at what LaRouche said when visiting Sudan in 2001, invited by the same Bashir: http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2001/2806_sudan_concluding.html

"In these days, it is fashionable to exaggerate the importance of democracy. Because the idea of democracy, as it is taught by international institutions, which use it as a way of manipulating governments, and manipulating people, is the idea of democracy that comes from where? In European civilization this usage comes directly from the Roman Empire.

Now, how did the Roman Empire control its people? It controlled its people through vox populi, popular opinion. It controlled its people through bread and circuses, by shaping popular opinion. It shaped its opinions by putting the people as spectators to watch Romans kill other Romans as gladiators, and the passions were involved with these kinds of violent spectator sports. And by these mechanisms, the Roman rulers manipulated the people in the name of democracy, into a mob of popular opinion.

Now, we see a lot of that in politics in various forms. The question is, not whether a government is democratic or not. The question is, whether the government is fit to exist or not. That's the issue; whether it's democratically chosen or not is not the question. Is it fit to exist? Are people capable of selecting government which is fit to exist?"

LaRouche talks about saving the democracy one moment, the other he attacks it like in the above mentioned speech in Sudan.

In reality LaRouche would do as he said in his proposal for a CANADIAN CONSTITUTION in 1981. He would make sure that his opponents are not even allowed to vote, and that they have no right to free speech! (  http://american-lycurgus.blogspot.com/2009/03/canadian-constitution-blueprint-for.html )

/T

LaRouche and the revisionist Liberty Lobby

The "Brave New World" of Lyndon LaRouche is filled with paradoxes... Filled with double standards!

Lets take Liberty Lobby, Spotlight and Willis Carto as an example! It is now quite well established that Lyndon LaRouche and the holocaust deniers around WIllis carto and the now defuncted Spotlight newspaper, had exstensive contacts from mid 1970s and onwards!

http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&safe=off&num=100&q=Willis+Carto+LaRouche&btnG=Sök&meta=

When I was a member of the organization this was known, but almost not discussed at all. If discussed it was explained as "just another person Lyndon LaRouche happened to meet". Understandable, because the network of Carto are not really some nice guys! They are one of the the worlds largest producer of neo nazi literature, including literature that denies that the holocaust occured!

Now when I look back on it I can see the double standard in this. When I was in the USA the contacts that belonged to the Liberty Lobby (or read, or had read, Spotlight) were always described by the members as being the most "blocked" members of all, that were "racist" and could not understand the ideas of LaRouche fully. 

But still... The members, the leaders of the organization and Lyndon LaRouche all were silent.  No major attacks against the network of Carto was initiated by laRouche. And you should keep in mind that LaRouche normally attacked just about anything that was considered "a blocking", an impediment that prevented the contacts and friends of the organization to contribute with their money and time to it... But the Liberty Lobby and Carto... No! As far as I can remember, NOTHING! (And there is nothing on the web either that implies that Lyndon has ever has attacked or distanced himself IN PUBLIC from them!)

The question should be asked what kind of human being could cooperate with a monster like Carto, as Lyndon laRouche has done? And why has Lyndon been so silent about this network in public, and not distanced himself, since the "talk" among the members were that these networks was soooo "blocked"? 

Just read for yourselves: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndCarto.html

Or could it be that the cooperation and mutual admiration between Carto (and perhaps the european C.O.D.E. revisionists) and LaRouche still exists, even today? 

It stinks... It is the smell of LaRouchian double standards, and totalitarianism, that stinks!

/T

PS... Which reminds me that EAP in Sweden too has had its dubious friends. Ok, the nazi Sven Arne Lundehäll never became a real contact of the organization, but why did Kerstin go to Bohuslän just to meet with this madman, whom all knew was a nazi? Why have a contact meeting with a madman?And Juri Lina? Ok, today Juri Lina and EAP has very limited contact, if any at all, but the contact with this Estonian-Swedish holocaust denier was more intense during the 80s when the LaRouchemovement was bashing russians!

You know an organization, as well as a person, by the friends it has!

Lyndon LaRouche and "peace through hate" in the Middle East!

In the end of 1978 Lyndon LaRouche published The Dope Inc, where he uses the antisemitic protocols of the Elders of Sion. He also published "Sionism is not judaism" as well as other things with a very strange, some say antisemitic, content: http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Library.Archives70 

I would agree if it was not so that I know that LaRouche would say just anything evil about just about anybody, so I dont view it as antisemitic, I think it is WORSE than antisemitic!

In the beginning of 1978 he published "A machiavellian solution for Israel", and putting forward his solutions for a peace based on development of the water resources of the area. It was followed by "The Grand Design for World Development: The Nuplex and U.S. Vital Interests," Fusion, August 1978. In 1980 several proposals was put forward. like this one: U.S. Middle East Policy.  

http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2006/2006_30-39/2006_30-39/2006-34/pdf/12-15_634_lyn.pdf  

During my time in the movement I often looked at at old issues of the EIR and New Solidarity. I remember that I saw articles that both promoted the Dope Inc of 1978 and that tried to get Israel to accept the LaRouchian proposals for a peace based on "economic development". LaRouche was actually so mad that he tried to organize a peace in the Middle East, and tried to get a dialogue with the israelis, by using, among others, the Dope Inc with its rantings about the antisemitic Protocols of the Elders of Sion! (sic!) No wonder that the LaRouchian attempts to "create a peace" has failed so far!

Everyone that seriously wants peace in the Middle East should study the origins of the LaRouchian peace proposals, before they endorse his view on it!  

/T

PS. It should be admitted that LaRouche in using the protocol in Dope Inc slanders both the Catholics and the jews. In the same chapter he compares two forgeries, The Protocols of The Elders of Sion and alleged oaths of the Knights of Colombus in Mexico. ( [url]http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/images/dopeinc1978_Page_32.jpg[/url] ) He slanders sionists, jesuits, Knights of Colombus and Knights of St John in the same attempt to prove that an "oligarchy" of jews and catholics and others, are behind the drug trade

Name Calling, part 3, did LaRouche really say this?

Did He Really Say It??

(A post borrowed from the www.laroucheplanet.info site! http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=HaveFun.DidHeReallySayIt

...the answer is YES!

"Hollywood is actually the U.S. capital of Satanism." (1)

"You'll find Obama's ancestry, if you chase his family tree, everybody's climbing and swinging from the branches there--from all over the world! All parts of the world! This guy is the universal man. Every monkey in every tree, from every part of the world, has participated in the sexual act of producing him." (2)

"Bullshit! This is not a democratic situation; this is a time where democracy is the worst factor you can get. You've got a democracy in the streets now, they want to kill these guys. That's the democracy I want to hear from," he (LaRouche, ed.) said. "I don't want to hear from these so-called Democrats; I want to hear from the killers! " (3)

"Can we imagine anything more viciously sadistic than the Black Ghetto mother?" (4)

"[The Leesburg Garden Club is a] nest of Soviet fellow travelers … clacking busybodies in a Soviet jellyfish front, sitting here in Leesburg oozing out their funny little propaganda and making nuisances of themselves." (5)

"If I am successfully destroyed, then the descent of a New Dark Age, this time on a global scale, is ensured." (6)
"Thank Obama. Blame Obama, the embalmer. He will bury more people than are killed or die. Obviously, the way Obama is going, with this mentality, he couldn't win in an election against John McCain. Consider him as on the way out if he is going to take this line. He will be out quicker than you can say Rezko, if he keeps talking like this." (7)

"At this time, he (Obama, ed.) should fear no adversary more deadly than himself. It is time to change the baby; either he changes his own diapers, so to speak, or the stench from the diapers will change his candidacy." (8)

Sources:

1. What's Behind the O.J. Simpson Media Spectacle
2. LaRouche in racist rant against Senator Obama
3. LaRouche: No Compromise, No Consensus, No Bailout! Some have gotten his message plain and clear Everyone is militia!
4. The Politics of Male Impotence, NCLC Internal memo, Lyn Marcus (Lyndon H. LaRouche), 1973.
5. "EX-AIDE: LAROUCHE EXTRAVAGANT", Chicago Tribune December 2, 1988
6. THE ADVERSARY RELATIONSHIP
7. LaRouche: Obama Is An Idiot And You Can Quote Me On That June 11, 2008 (LPAC)
8. LaRouche: As of Now, Obama Would Lose! July 1, 2008 (LPAC)

Go to the LaRoucheplanet for the exact sources:

http://laroucheplanet.info/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=HaveFun.DidHeReallySayIt

/T